http://noel.weichbrodt.org/notes-from-al-plantiga-lecture-evolutionary-psychology-and-scriptural-scholarship/ A young .NET software engineer cog in the St. Louis military-industrial complex avoiding the alienation of the worker from his work by any means necessary... Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:49:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://noel.weichbrodt.org/notes-from-al-plantiga-lecture-evolutionary-psychology-and-scriptural-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-279 glen Tue, 04 Apr 2006 05:49:35 +0000 http://www.noel.weichbrodt.org/notes-from-al-plantiga-lecture-evolutionary-psychology-and-scriptural-scholarship/#comment-279 Sumners' "Folkways", 1911 addressed many of the same questions. He seemed to define the expression as "antagonism". Yes I know, prior to Darwin being given more than a nod, still applicable to the science/religion divisions. Best regards Sumners’ “Folkways”, 1911 addressed many of the same questions. He seemed to define the expression as “antagonism”. Yes I know, prior to Darwin being given more than a nod, still applicable to the science/religion divisions.
Best regards

]]> http://noel.weichbrodt.org/notes-from-al-plantiga-lecture-evolutionary-psychology-and-scriptural-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-278 glen Tue, 04 Apr 2006 05:39:15 +0000 http://www.noel.weichbrodt.org/notes-from-al-plantiga-lecture-evolutionary-psychology-and-scriptural-scholarship/#comment-278 Sumners' "Folkways", 1911 addressed many of the same questions. He seemed to define the expression as "antagonism". Yes I know, prior to Darwin being given more than a nod, still applicable to the science/religion divisions. Best regards Sumners’ “Folkways”, 1911 addressed many of the same questions. He seemed to define the expression as “antagonism”. Yes I know, prior to Darwin being given more than a nod, still applicable to the science/religion divisions.
Best regards

]]>