Comments on: Impressive List of Languages Ported to .NET Runtime

By: Noel

Noel — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:27:48 +0000

I am indeed on 2.0. It’s nice. We’re using generics and anonymous methods in most of our stuff now, and I’m still figuring out closures.

By: glen

glen — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:20:47 +0000

Thanks Noel I will. O’course that assumes I finish c++ by summer and Oracle dos not buy Novell and all its assets.
Best regards

By: Noel

Noel — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:32:33 +0000

You can’t please everyone all the time.

Luther, the trick is to follow read the next post after following the advice of the previous one. Porting to the .NET runtime makes a lot more sense when you’re buzzed on cheap wine.

Glen, the Newsforge article is fascinating. You should check out Mono.

By: bobw

bobw — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:32:32 +0000

cool. are you on 2.0 yet? I just started at a Very Large Insurance Company, and I’m about to dive into 2.0, and I’m pretty psyched about it. who knew I could be such a geek?

By: Luther

Luther — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:16:29 +0000

I found your previous entry more practical. Also, I understood it.

By: glen

glen — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:31:37 +0000

huh? http://www.us.debian.org/ports/

http://software.newsforge.com/software/06/04/14/1535251.shtml?tid=150

best regards